In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4610M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 37 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 55% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 55% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | AM4 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
