Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4069 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Core i7-3930K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $252.25 vs $765.76
- Up to 61% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.78 vs $2.00 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3930K - 383 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
323
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€252.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €252.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7039 minutes ago
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7039 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |