Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3978 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $283.97 vs $604.65
- Up to 46% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.05 vs $1.96 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-3820 - 343 vs 299 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
299
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €315.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
343
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
54%
Price, €
€671.16
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |