Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3879 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $136.04 vs $417.64
- Up to 58% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900KF - $1.13 vs $2.66 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - 157 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
120
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €136.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
42%
Price, €
€417.64
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €417.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |