Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3978 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $315.21 vs $522.51
- Up to 29% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-13900 - $1.92 vs $2.71 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 18% better in God of War than Core i7-3820 - 193 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
164
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €315.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Buy for €522.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |