Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $181.14 vs $266.21
- Up to 20% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-14700F - $1.63 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-3770K - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 28 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
111
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €181.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.05/FPS
80%
Price, €
€266.21
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €266.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |