Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3476 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770K - 467 vs 382 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $117.35 vs $129.94
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770K - $0.28 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
467
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €130.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |