Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $82.96 vs $765.76
- Up to 88% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13400F - $0.75 vs $6.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-3770 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
111
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7261 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.13/FPS
12%
Price, €
€765.76
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7260 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |