The Core i7-3770 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105T and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $22.70 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
- Up to 28% cheaper – $58.36 vs $81.06
Advantages of the Core i3-10105T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10105T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
171
93%
Min 1% FPS
115
94%
Price, €
€58.36
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
€81.06
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
77%
Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10105T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10105T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10105T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$278.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |