The Core i7-3770 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 200GE and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $4.69 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
- Up to 7% cheaper – $58.36 vs $63.05
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 200GE
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
Core i7-3770 vs Athlon 200GE for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
171
97%
Min 1% FPS
115
97%
Price, €
€58.36
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Average FPS
176
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, €
€63.05
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
97%
Core i7-3770 vs Athlon 200GE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770 vs Athlon 200GE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770 vs Athlon 200GE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
$278.00 | MSRP | $55.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
77 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |