In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3740QM is much slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3740QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 113% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3740QM
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
47%
Price, $
$213.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3740QM
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3740QM Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
