The Core i7-3612QM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Core i7-3612QM vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
168
88%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, €
€267.95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Core i7-3612QM vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3612QM vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3612QM vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
70%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3612QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |