Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4271 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3612QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 316% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3612QM - 104 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€440.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €440.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 440 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |