Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2863 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-2860QM - 224 vs 208 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2860QM | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |