In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2820QM is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
