Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4471 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-2670QM - 116 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2670QM | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
