In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2635QM is slower than the Core i5-10400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i5-10400
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 78 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2635QM vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
78 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
67%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
