Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Core i7-2600S
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $190.73 vs $730.45
- Up to 60% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-13400F - $3.47 vs $8.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 54% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-2600S - 94 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 16 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
61
65%
Value, €/FPS
€3.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600S | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |