The Core i7-2600K is a much faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $91.78 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-2600K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Up to 39% cheaper – $143.24 vs $235.02
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
Core i7-2600K vs Core i3-3210 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€235.02
60%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
62%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
98%
Min 1% FPS
113
98%
Price, €
€143.24
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Core i7-2600K vs Core i3-3210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600K vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2600K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $317.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
