Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2645 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700 - 486 vs 409 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $99.28 vs $279.28
- Up to 58% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - $0.24 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
42%
Price, €
€279.28
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5993 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
409
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5994 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700K | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |