Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-12700F - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $212.60 vs $288.27
- Up to 20% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-13700K - $1.43 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
80%
Price, €
€288.27
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
149
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€212.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €212.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700K | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |