Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10100 - 196 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $82.87 vs $288.27
- Up to 68% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700K - $0.47 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
32%
Price, €
€288.27
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700K | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |