Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770 - 255 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $74.74 vs $191.53
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-12700F - $0.36 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €212.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |