The Core i7-11375H is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-11375H
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
The Core i7-11375H is better in every way
Core i7-11375H vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-11375H
Jan 11th, 2021
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
88%
Min 1% FPS
115
90%
Price, €
€180.07
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Core i7-11375H vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11375H vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11375H vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11375H
Jan 11th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-11375H | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
$482.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |