Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Core i7-10700KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - 204 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $179.28 vs $203.56
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.88 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €203.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6517 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €179.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6517 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700KF | vs | Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |