In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10700F is faster than the Ryzen 5 2600. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $145 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6 – 83 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer
Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 59% cheaper – $99.99 vs $245.00
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.40 vs $2.95/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
83 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
40%
Value, $/FPS
$2.95/FPS
47%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
71 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
85%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
