In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $69 cheaper!
Core i7-10700F
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 17% cheaper – $329.95 vs $399.00
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.88 vs $4.63/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
85 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
98%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
82%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
