Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i7-3770 - 177 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $74.74 vs $168.77
- Up to 53% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-10700F - $0.50 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
47%
Price, €
€187.34
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €187.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 641 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
165
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 640 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |