Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $187.34 vs $243.05
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-13700F - $0.90 vs $1.08 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700F - 226 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€187.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €187.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6488 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
83%
Price, €
€243.05
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6486 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |