In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-L16G7 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Is 1 month and 13 days newer – Jun 13, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 month and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 13th, 2020
Cores
5-core
62%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
37%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
59%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
69%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 13th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 13th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1200 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
