Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Core i5-9600K
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $109.91 vs $129.34
- Up to 12% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12400 - $0.60 vs $0.68 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i5-9600K - 189 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 12 vs 6 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
182
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7030 minutes ago
Buy for €129.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7030 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9600K | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |