Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $96.59 vs $351.41
- Up to 65% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900K - $0.62 vs $1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400F - 218 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
35%
Price, €
€390.07
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |