Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1031 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - $94.59 vs $171.16
- Up to 39% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-12700KF - $0.78 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 134 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7440 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
61%
Price, €
€171.16
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €171.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7439 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |