Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1359 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600.
Advantages of Core i5-8600
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $92.97 vs $251.35
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - $0.49 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8600 - 214 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
188
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7021 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
42%
Price, €
€251.35
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7021 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8600 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |