Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1639 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Core i5-8400T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $102.14 vs $450.34
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i9-13900K - $0.72 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 53% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i5-8400T - 217 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
142
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €102.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 303 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
35%
Price, €
€450.34
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8400T | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |