Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2203 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Core i5-8400
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $64.93 vs $351.43
- Up to 74% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-14900K - $0.35 vs $1.37 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-8400 - 285 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
204
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
26%
Price, €
€390.09
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8400 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |