In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-8300H is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-8300H
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 45 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 92 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1652
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
13962
100%
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8300H vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8300H
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
12%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8300H Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | TRX4 |
45W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
