Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4839 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Core i5-760
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $38.95 vs $351.41
- Up to 84% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-14900K - $0.19 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-760 - 319 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
223
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
319
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
16%
Price, €
€390.07
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |