Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Core i5-760
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $43.24 vs $765.76
- Up to 93% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - $0.28 vs $4.21 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-760 - 182 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
154
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7250 minutes ago
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7250 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |