Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Core i5-7500T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $47.00 vs $730.45
- Up to 88% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13400F - $1.21 vs $10.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 86% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-7500T - 80 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
43
54%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |