Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Core i5-7400T
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $52.40 vs $730.45
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - $0.44 vs $5.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7400T - 143 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
132
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €58.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |