Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Core i5-661
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $64.93 vs $338.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.79 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-661 - 139 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.71/FPS
29%
Price, €
€376.23
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-661 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
87 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |