Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4745 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Core i5-661
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $64.93 vs $730.45
- Up to 88% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13400F - $0.79 vs $6.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-661 - 123 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-661 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
87 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |