Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Core i5-5675C
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $73.05 vs $219.10
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-12900KF - $0.60 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-5675C - 146 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 24 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
135
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
36%
Price, €
€243.2
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-5675C | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |