Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 4319 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 86% better in Starfield than Core i5-540M - 78 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-540M - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-540M doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-540M | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |