In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-5257U is slower than the Core i9-9920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5257U
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 28 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 83% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9920X
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6 – 81 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-5257U vs Core i9-9920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$698.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5257U vs Core i9-9920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5257U vs Core i9-9920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5257U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5257U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$315.00 | MSRP | $1,189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA2066 |
28W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel Iris 6100 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
