Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2826 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Core i5-4690
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $45.45 vs $62.32
- Up to 21% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-12100F - $0.19 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i5-4690 - 286 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 58 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
271
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
79%
Price, €
€69.17
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4690 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |