The Core i5-4590S is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7500T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $82.90 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-4590S
The Core i5-7500T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-7500T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 63% cheaper – $48.15 vs $131.05
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i5-4590S vs Core i5-7500T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4590S
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€131.05
36%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
36%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€48.15
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Core i5-4590S vs Core i5-7500T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590S vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590S vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590S
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4590S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |