Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3160 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Core i5-4460
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $57.69 vs $765.76
- Up to 92% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-13400F - $0.30 vs $3.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-4460 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
190
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€57.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €57.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7501 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |