In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4200U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 45% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 45% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4200U vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4200U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
49%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4200U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $547.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
